Editorial Annotation

Delegation

Delegation

Introduction

This section allows the Minister of Justice to delegate investigation powers to qualified individuals.

Statutory Text

696.2(3) Despite subsection 11(3) of the Inquiries Act, the Minister of Justice may delegate in writing to any member in good standing of the bar of a province, retired judge or any other individual who, in the opinion of the Minister, has similar background or experience the powers of the Minister to take evidence, issue subpoenas, enforce the attendance of witnesses, compel them to give evidence and otherwise conduct an investigation under subsection (2).

Explanation

Section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides the Minister of Justice with the ability to delegate certain powers to any individual who has sufficient experience or background to conduct investigations related to criminal matters. The powers included in this section allow individuals who have been delegated these powers to take evidence, issue subpoenas, enforce the attendance of witnesses, and compel them to give evidence. Essentially, this section provides the Minister of Justice with the ability to authorize qualified individuals to act as investigators in specific matters. One important aspect of this section is the fact that it overrides subsection 11(3) of the Inquiries Act, which states that only certain individuals or bodies may carry out inquiries on behalf of the government. This provision ensures that the Minister of Justice has greater flexibility in selecting individuals to conduct investigations as needed. The individuals who may be delegated these powers under section 696.2(3) include members in good standing of a provincial bar, retired judges, and any other individuals who the Minister deems to have sufficient qualifications. This provision emphasizes the importance of experience and expertise in conducting criminal investigations, while also allowing for a degree of flexibility in determining who is best suited to carry out such investigations. Overall, section 696.2(3) plays an important role in enabling the government to effectively investigate criminal matters, while also ensuring that investigations are conducted by qualified individuals who have the necessary skills and experience to do so.

Commentary

Canadian law has always placed great importance on the protection of fundamental human rights, and to achieve this end, the Criminal Code of Canada has, on several occasions, been amended to facilitate investigations aimed at uncovering violations of these rights. Section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a valuable tool in this respect, as it empowers the Minister of Justice to delegate investigative powers to individuals who possess the necessary skills and experience. This section of the Criminal Code has two primary objectives: firstly, it allows the Minister of Justice to delegate in writing the powers granted to him or her under subsection (2) of section 696.2 of the Criminal Code of Canada to any individual the Minister considers suitable for the job; secondly, it ensures that such delegations are not subject to the requirements of subsection 11(3) of the Inquiries Act. By enacting this section of the Criminal Code, the Canadian government has provided the Minister of Justice with a critical tool to combat criminal activities that threaten the human rights of Canadians. It is essential to note that the individuals who can receive such delegations under section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code must meet several requirements. They must be members in good standing of the bar of a province, a retired judge or any person who, in the opinion of the Minister, possesses similar background or experience. The requirement of membership in good standing of the bar of a province means that the Minister will delegate the powers under this section of the Criminal Code of Canada to individuals who have proven themselves to be competent and ethical legal practitioners. Another critical feature of section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code is that the individuals receiving such delegations have broad investigative powers that are similar to those of the Minister of Justice. For instance, they can take evidence, issue subpoenas, enforce the attendance of witnesses, compel them to give evidence, and otherwise conduct an investigation under subsection (2). This delegation of power is particularly advantageous when investigating human rights violations or other serious crimes that require significant resources and expertise to uncover. Moreover, by delegating these powers, this section of the Criminal Code frees up valuable resources that would otherwise have been used by the Minister of Justice in conducting these investigations. Furthermore, delegating these powers to qualified investigators helps to increase public trust in the legal system by demonstrating that serious criminal activities are being given the attention they deserve and are being addressed by individuals with the requisite legal expertise. Overall, section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is an important legal tool that ensures the effective investigation of serious criminal activities that threaten the fundamental human rights of Canadians. The delegations provided by this section of the Criminal Code facilitate the investigation of such activities, while at the same time promoting public confidence in the integrity of the Canadian justice system.

Strategy

Section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada is a provision that allows the Minister of Justice to delegate certain powers related to investigations to individuals who have relevant backgrounds or experience. As with any delegation of power, there are strategic considerations that need to be taken into account when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code. One of the key strategic considerations is the selection of the individuals who will be delegated the powers under this provision. It is important to choose individuals who have the necessary expertise and experience to conduct the investigation effectively. This could include lawyers with experience in criminal law, retired judges with experience in conducting investigations, or individuals with expertise in a particular area relevant to the investigation. Another strategic consideration is ensuring that the delegated individuals have the necessary resources to conduct the investigation effectively. This includes providing them with adequate funding, support staff, and logistical support. It is also important to ensure that they have access to any relevant information or documents necessary to conduct the investigation. A further strategic consideration is ensuring that the investigation is conducted in a transparent and impartial manner. This requires that the delegated individuals act independently and without bias. It is important to ensure that any conflicts of interest are identified and managed appropriately. In terms of strategies that could be employed when dealing with this section of the Criminal Code, one approach could be to conduct a thorough review of potential candidates for delegation of powers under this provision and select those with the most relevant expertise and experience. Another strategy could be to provide the delegated individuals with training or support to ensure that they have the necessary skills to conduct an effective investigation. Another approach could be to establish clear guidelines and procedures for the conduct of the investigation, including rules around the use of evidence and the treatment of witnesses. This could help ensure that the investigation is conducted in a fair and transparent manner, and will help ensure that any findings or recommendations are credible and can be relied upon. Finally, it may be important to engage with stakeholders and the public throughout the investigation process. This could involve providing regular updates on the progress of the investigation, conducting consultations with affected parties, and ensuring that the final report or recommendations are made public. This can help build confidence in the investigation process and ensure that the findings are widely accepted. In conclusion, Section 696.2(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada provides an important tool for conducting investigations. There are strategic considerations that need to be taken into account when dealing with this provision, including selecting the right individuals, providing them with the necessary resources, ensuring impartiality and transparency, and engaging with stakeholders and the public. Employing these strategies can help ensure that investigations are conducted effectively and credibly.